MULTI-INSTRUMENT ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN FEMALE OFFICE WORKERS

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridBiernat, Elzbieta/0000-0002-4675-5017
dc.authoridARSLAN, ERSAN/0000-0002-2933-6937
dc.authoridErsoz, Gulfem/0000-0001-8813-3032
dc.authoridKilit, Bulent/0000-0002-9061-0691
dc.contributor.authorCan, Sema
dc.contributor.authorGunduz, Nevin
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Ersan
dc.contributor.authorBiernat, Elzbieta
dc.contributor.authorErsoz, Gulfem
dc.contributor.authorKilit, Bulent
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-24T19:30:01Z
dc.date.available2024-12-24T19:30:01Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.departmentSiirt Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractObjectives: The aim of this study was to examine the multi-instrument assessment of physical activity in female office workers. Material and Methods: Fifty healthy women (age (mean +/- standard deviation): 34.8 +/- 5.9 years, body height: 158 +/- 0.4 cm, body weight: 61.8 +/- 7.5 kg, body mass index: 24.6 +/- 2.7 kg/m(2)) workers from the same workplace volunteered to participate in the study. Physical activity was measured with the 7-day Physical Activity Assessment Questionnaire (7-d PAAQ), an objective multi-sensor armband tool, and also a waist-mounted pedometer, which were both worn for 7 days. Results: A significant correlation between step numbers measured by armband and pedometer was observed (r = 0.735), but the step numbers measured by these 2 methods were significantly different (10 941 +/- 2236 steps/day and 9170 +/- 2377 steps/day, respectively; p < 0.001). There was a weak correlation between the value of 7-d PAAQ total energy expenditure and the value of armband total energy expenditure (r = 0.394, p = 0.005). However, total energy expenditure values measured by armband and 7-d PAAQ were not significantly different (2081 +/- 370 kcal/day and 2084 +/- 197 kcal/day, respectively; p = 0.96). In addition, physical activity levels (average daily metabolic equivalents (MET)) measured by armband and 7-d PAAQ were not significantly different (1.45 +/- 0.12 MET/day and 1.47 +/- 0.24 MET/day, respectively; p = 0.44). Conclusions: The results of this study showed that the correlation between pedometer and armband measurements was higher than that between armband measurements and 7-d PAAQ self-reports. Our results suggest that none of the assessment methods examined here, 7-d PAAQ, pedometer, or armband, is sufficient when used as a single tool for physical activity level determination. Therefore, multi-instrument assessment methods are preferable.
dc.identifier.doi10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00710
dc.identifier.endpage945
dc.identifier.issn1232-1087
dc.identifier.issn1896-494X
dc.identifier.issue6
dc.identifier.pmid27869244
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85015653624
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ2
dc.identifier.startpage937
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.13075/ijomeh.1896.00710
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12604/7330
dc.identifier.volume29
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000389646500009
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherNofer Inst Occupational Medicine, Poland
dc.relation.ispartofInternational Journal of Occupational Medicine and Environmental Health
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241222
dc.subjectPhysical activity
dc.subjectQuestionnaire
dc.subjectSedentary lifestyle
dc.subjectFemale office workers
dc.subjectPedometer
dc.subjectSensewear armband
dc.titleMULTI-INSTRUMENT ASSESSMENT OF PHYSICAL ACTIVITY IN FEMALE OFFICE WORKERS
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu