Running-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authoridARSLAN, ERSAN/0000-0002-2933-6937
dc.authoridClemente, Filipe Manuel/0000-0001-9813-2842
dc.contributor.authorArslan, Ersan
dc.contributor.authorOrer, Gamze Erikoglu
dc.contributor.authorClemente, Filipe Manuel
dc.date.accessioned2024-12-24T19:32:53Z
dc.date.available2024-12-24T19:32:53Z
dc.date.issued2020
dc.departmentSiirt Üniversitesi
dc.description.abstractThis study aimed to compare the effects of 5-week running-based high-intensity interval training (HIIT) vs. small-sided game training (SSG) on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players. Twenty young male soccer players (age: 14.2 +/- 0.5 years, height: 161.8 +/- 7.9 cm) participated in this study and were assigned to two groups: the HIIT group (n=10) and SSG group (n=10). Both groups trained twice per week with a similar total training duration. The SSG consisted of two 5-9 minutes of 2-a-side with 2-minute passive rest periods, whereas the HIIT consisted of 12-20 minutes of continuous runs at intensities (90 to 95%) related to the velocity obtained in the 30-15 intermittent fitness test. Before and after the 5-week training periods the following tests were completed: maximum oxygen consumption (VO2max) from the Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test level 1 (YYIRTL-1), 10-30-m sprint test, countermovement jump [CMJJ, squat jump (SA and drop jump [DA, 1000-m run test, zigzag agility, repeated sprint ability, 30-15 intermittent fitness test and speed dribbling ability test. Our results revealed meaningful improvements in YYIRTL-1 performance (SSG: +12.8%, standardized effect size [d]=-1.46; HIIT: +16.4%, d=3.27 and VO2max(SSG: +3.3%, d=-1.48; HIIT: +4.3%, d=2.61). There was a meaningful greater improvement in agility and technical test performances following the SSG training compared with the HIIT (p <= 0.05, d= ranging from 0.92 to 1.99). By contrast, the HIIT group showed meaningfully higher performance responses in terms of the 1000-m running time and repeated sprint test ability (p 0.05, d=ranging from 0.90 to 2.06). These results confirmed that SSG training might be a more effective training regime to improve technical ability and agility with greater enjoyment, whereas HIIT might be more suitable for speed-based conditioning in young soccer players.
dc.identifier.doi10.5114/biolsport.2020.94237
dc.identifier.endpage173
dc.identifier.issn0860-021X
dc.identifier.issn2083-1862
dc.identifier.issue2
dc.identifier.pmid32508384
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85090550239
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ1
dc.identifier.startpage165
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.5114/biolsport.2020.94237
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12604/7859
dc.identifier.volume37
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000526722200008
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ2
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.indekslendigikaynakPubMed
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherInst Sport
dc.relation.ispartofBiology of Sport
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/closedAccess
dc.snmzKA_20241222
dc.subjectFootball
dc.subjectPerformance
dc.subjectTechnique
dc.subjectPsychophysiological responses
dc.subjectDrill-based tasks
dc.subjectPhysical enjoyment
dc.titleRunning-based high-intensity interval training vs. small-sided game training programs: effects on the physical performance, psychophysiological responses and technical skills in young soccer players
dc.typeArticle

Dosyalar

Koleksiyon

WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
PubMed İndeksli Yayın Koleksiyonu
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu