Comparison of different determining methods of reference eto based on limited weather conditions in gap region

Basit Öğe Kaydı
dc.authorid0000000261859359en_US
dc.contributor.authorAydın, Yusuf
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-26T10:32:17Z
dc.date.available2019-12-26T10:32:17Z
dc.date.issued2019en_US
dc.departmentZiraat Fakültesien_US
dc.description.abstractReference crop evapotranspiration (ETo) is among the most important components of the hydrologic cycle. Standard FAO-Penman-Monteith method is the most frequently used equation to estimate of ETo. However, the usability of this method is limited due to its complexity Hargreaveas-Samani (HS) and Turc methods that can be operated with limited data such as temperature and solar radiation are used as an alternative to the standard method. In the present study, the reference ETo values estimated with FAO-PM as the standard method, Hargreaveas-Samani and Turc methods were compared at semi-arid climate conditions. Based on the acquired results; highest R2 value at the GAP region with semi-arid climate conditions was determined as 0.9872 from the monthly averages of ETo-PM and ETo-HS comparison, whereas the lowest RMSE value was also obtained from the same monthly comparison (0.08). ETo-Turc method yielded a monthly average comparison of 0.981 for the R2 values comparison. While ETo-CAP put forth the lowest values for all three intervals. It is suggested that HS method can be used instead of Standart Penman-Monteith method (FAO-PM) under GAP region semi arid climate conditions for reference ETo estimation if Penman-Monteith can not be calculated. The Turc method is also can be a good alternative to estimate potential evapotranspiration that can be measured by Class A pan. And that ETo estimation should be made by determining the Kp value in case CAP based ETo estimation is carried out.en_US
dc.identifier.citationAydın, Y 2019. Comparison of different determining methods of Reference ETo based on limited weather conditionsin GAP region. Applied Ecology and Environmental Research, 2019, 17(4):10239-10251en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.15666/aeer/1704_1023910251
dc.identifier.endpage10251en_US
dc.identifier.issue4en_US
dc.identifier.scopus2-s2.0-85070470205
dc.identifier.scopusqualityQ3
dc.identifier.startpage10239en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://www.aloki.hu/
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12604/2462
dc.identifier.volume17en_US
dc.identifier.wosWOS:000478066700207
dc.identifier.wosqualityQ4
dc.indekslendigikaynakWeb of Science
dc.indekslendigikaynakScopus
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherALÖKI, Kft, Budapest, Hungaryen_US
dc.relation.ispartofApplied Ecology and Environmental Research
dc.relation.publicationcategoryMakale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanıen_US
dc.rightsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessen_US
dc.snmzKG_20241224
dc.subjectreference EToen_US
dc.subjectFAO-Penman equationen_US
dc.subjectHargreaves-Samani equationen_US
dc.subjectTurc equationen_US
dc.subjectpistachioen_US
dc.titleComparison of different determining methods of reference eto based on limited weather conditions in gap regionen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US

Dosyalar

Orijinal paket
Listeleniyor 1 - 2 / 2
Küçük Resim
İsim:
A51- Comparison of Different Determining methods of Reference ETo....pdf
Boyut:
425.18 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale
İndir
Küçük Resim
İsim:
A51- Comparison of Different Determining methods of Reference ETo....pdf
Boyut:
425.18 KB
Biçim:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Açıklama:
Makale
İndir
Lisans paketi
Listeleniyor 1 - 1 / 1
[ X ]
İsim:
license.txt
Boyut:
1.44 KB
Biçim:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Açıklama:
İndir

Koleksiyon

2) Makale
Scopus İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu
WOS İndeksli Yayınlar Koleksiyonu