A SURVEY ON WEED MANAGEMENT IN DRY LENTIL FIELDS
dc.contributor.author | Pala, F. | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-12-24T19:30:15Z | |
dc.date.available | 2024-12-24T19:30:15Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.department | Siirt Üniversitesi | |
dc.description.abstract | A questionnaire consisting of 20 questions about weed, herbicide, tillage and crop rotation was applied to 100 lentil farmers to determine the current state of a weed problem in lentil fields in 2016. Common weeds were determined charlock mustard (Sinapis arvensis L., 36%), devil-on-all-sides (Ranunculus arvensis L., 16%), cleavers (Galium aparine L., 11%), makhobeli (Cephalaria syriaca L., 8%), and knapweed (Centaurea depressa L., 8%), respectively. The majority of participants used aclonifen (89%) as a post-emergence to control broadleaf, besides, clethodim (26%), haloxyfop-methylester (17%), tepraloxydim (16%), quizalofop p-ethyl (15%), and fluazifop p-butyl (6%) for grass, respectively, and as a total herbicide glyphosate (4%) as well. But, respondents (66%) stated that lentils had crop injury from aclonifen. Growers took into account the price (43%), herbicides (38%), weeds (10%) and crop rotation (9%) to choose herbicides. Managing weeds with hand-picked (76%) were common in areas that did not use herbicides. Preventive measures were used such as crop rotation (61%), late sowing (10%), and deep tillage (4%), furthermore, farmers planted wheat (91%) and barley (9%) as a preceding crop. In this study, dissatisfaction was determined by the efficacy and selectivity of aclonifen which is registered herbicide on lentils in Turkey. Lentils have a short stature, slow early-season growth rate, and open-canopy growth habit, which make them poor competitors with broadleaf weeds. So weed management in the early period such as pre-planting, pre-emergence or early post-emergence herbicides, and IMI herbicide-tolerant lentil varieties (Clearfield) have been investigated. | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.15666/aeer/1706_1351313521 | |
dc.identifier.endpage | 13521 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1589-1623 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1785-0037 | |
dc.identifier.issue | 6 | |
dc.identifier.scopus | 2-s2.0-85077391537 | |
dc.identifier.scopusquality | Q3 | |
dc.identifier.startpage | 13513 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://doi.org/10.15666/aeer/1706_1351313521 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.12604/7445 | |
dc.identifier.volume | 17 | |
dc.identifier.wos | WOS:000505251300060 | |
dc.identifier.wosquality | Q4 | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Web of Science | |
dc.indekslendigikaynak | Scopus | |
dc.language.iso | en | |
dc.publisher | Corvinus Univ Budapest | |
dc.relation.ispartof | Applied Ecology and Environmental Research | |
dc.relation.publicationcategory | Makale - Uluslararası Hakemli Dergi - Kurum Öğretim Elemanı | |
dc.rights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | |
dc.snmz | KA_20241222 | |
dc.subject | lentils | |
dc.subject | mustard | |
dc.subject | aclonifen | |
dc.subject | crop rotation | |
dc.subject | late sowing | |
dc.subject | plow tillage | |
dc.title | A SURVEY ON WEED MANAGEMENT IN DRY LENTIL FIELDS | |
dc.type | Article |